This court disposed of a PIL and Civil Application regarding the set aside of an order extending time for sand excavation. The extension had lapsed, rendering the order ineffective.
The order extending time is set aside; Respondent No.7 may file a fresh application for extension or refund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.65 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15993 OF 2016.
Amol S/o Raghunath Wakade Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.N.S.Kadam, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.N.Nagargoje, advocate for applicant and for Respondent No.7 in PIL. Ms.S.S.Raut, A.G.P. for the State. Mr.N.S.Kadam, advocate for Respondent No.7 in C.A.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 09.12.2016. PER COURT :
2
learned Assistant Government Pleader.
(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.09.12.2016. asp/office/PIL65.14
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order extending time for excavation becomes inoperative and void once the extended period lapses.
Amol S/o Raghunath Wakade
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.7
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
K.L.WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
