In this PIL concerning Hazrat Baba Tajuddin Trust, the High Court observed that petitioners' grievances were redressed due to subsequent developments and disposed of the petition as having served its purpose.
The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as having served its purpose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2010pil100.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
P.I.L. No.100 of 2016
(Firoz Khan s/o. Karam Khan Taji and Ors. vs. Hazrat Baba Tajuddin Trust, Nagpur)
______________________________________________________________________________Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr.V.D.Muley, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.Dipesh Mehta, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.K.R.Luley, AGP for respondent nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
V.M.DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 20.10.2016.
Heard.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that, in view of subsequent developments, the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed. The Public Interest Litigation is, therefore, disposed of as having served its purpose.
No order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
jaiswal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Public Interest Litigation should be disposed of as its purpose has been served.
Firoz Khan s/o. Karam Khan Taji and Ors.
Hazrat Baba Tajuddin Trust
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
