The High Court at Nagpur allowed two civil applications by condoning delay and restoring the writ petition to file after reasons were stated.
Civil Applications allowed; delay condoned; Writ Petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.1CAO.127.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.O. NO. 127/16 IN M.C.A. ST. NO. 23509/15 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3653 OF 2014.
(Kundalik Budhaji Badole .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S. Borkar, Advocate for applicant,
Mr. S.M. Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 22, 2016.
For the reasons stated, Civil Application is allowed. Delay stands condoned.
M.C.A. ST. NO. 23509 OF 2015 :
For the reasons stated, Civil Application is allowed. The Writ Petition is restored to file.
Judge Judge J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application should be condoned.
Whether the writ petition should be restored to file.
Kundalik Budhaji Badole
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
