The court has disposed of this matter. The application is allowed per the concise application filed, with directions for amendment within a week. No substantive legal proposition is derived from this brief two-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2101appp1052.14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO. 1052 OF 2014 IN
CRI. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 3 OF 2014
(Kanhaiya Hotumal Raheja Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 21 JANUARY, 2016
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a week from today.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Kanhaiya Hotumal Raheja
The State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
P. N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
