Petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to move the DRAT; the Court granted leave and allowed the withdrawal.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move the DRAT was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
907-WP-1149-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1149 OF 2016
Ajay Mathur & Anr. .. Petitioners versus International Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents
.. Respondents
Mr. J. P. Cama - Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Deshmukh i/b. Ruby P. Madhye for Petitioners.
Mr. Rohit Gupta with Nupur Awasthi i/b. Consulta Juris for Respondents.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 21 JULY 2016
P.C.:
1] Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after the matter was argued for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to move the DRAT.
2] Leave granted. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Ajay Mathur & Anr.
International Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
