The court held that considering the pendency of old matters, the civil application for early hearing could not be allowed at the time. The application was therefore rejected without elaboration of legal principle. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2201caw137.16
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 137 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.603 OF 2014
(Vinod s/o Keshaorao Vitonde vs. The Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled and others)
__________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Ms. A. Singh, Advocate h/f Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for applicant/petitioner. Mrs. K. Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 3. Shri A. Parchure, Advocate for respondent no.4.
---------- CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 22, 2016
Taking into consideration pendency of old matters, civil application for early hearing cannot be considered at this stage. The civil application is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Vinod s/o Keshaorao Vitonde
The Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
