Anil S/O. Ramchandra Babhale v. Shri. a. K. Nigam, Pr. Chief Sect., Revenue and Forest, State of Maha., through Mantralaya and Othe
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP129-16.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CONTEMPT PETITION No.129 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) No.462 OF 2014 Anil Ramchandra Babhale
-Vrs.-
Shri A.K.Nigam and 2 others.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. S.N.Bhattad, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. Geeta Tiwari, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 29th JULY, 2016
The petitioner has filed present contempt petition contending therein that the respondents have committed contempt of this Court by disobeying the order passed by the Division Bench on 6.5.2015.
An affidavit has been filed by Shir Thangam Reddy, presently working as Chief Conservator of Forests and affidavit is dated 14.6.2016. Another affidavit dated 13.6.2016 is filed by Shri B. Mallikakrjun who is presently working as Deputy Conservator of Forests, Nagpur. The third one is filed on 20.6.2016 by Shri A.K. Nigam, who at the relevant time was working as Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HoFF).
The perusal of the three affidavits would reveal that action has been taken by the respondents in pursuance to the directions issued by this Court.
CP129-16.odt
2
In that view of the matter, we find that no further action needs to be taken. The contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.
Uploaded by : R.B. Hirekhan. Uploaded on:01-08-2016.
P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should continue after respondents filed affidavits showing compliance with the impugned order.
Anil Ramchandra Babhale
Shri A.K. Nigam
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court