Single-paragraph order restoring Misc. Civil Application No. 1081/2014 and Writ Petition No. 3941/2012 to file following a Supreme Court order dated 30.07.2014. Case disposed of.
Misc. Civil Application allowed; Writ Petition No. 3941/2012 restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mca1081.14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1081/2014 (FOR RESTORATION) IN WRIT PETITION NO.3941/2012 (D)
Alfansa Vincent Alfanso.vs.Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur & ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mrs. Kirti Satpute, Advocate for applicant. Mr. T. A. Mirza, A.G.P. for non applicant no.2-State. Mr. J. D. Bastian, Advocate for non applicant no.3.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : JULY 29, 2016
Heard Mrs Satpute, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Mirza, learned A.G.P. for non applicant no.2 and Mr. Bastion, learned counsel for non applicant no.3. None appears for non applicant no.1, though served.
For the reasons stated in the application, particularly in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court dated 30.07.2014 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4251/2014, the application is allowed. Writ Petition No. 3941/2012 is restored to file.
The Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
kahale
mca1081.14.odt
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order.
Uploaded by: Y. A. Kahale.
Uploaded On:29.07.2016
Alfansa Vincent Alfanso
Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur
State
Third Non-Applicant
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
