This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca1656716.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16567 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2122 OF 2010
Babu s/o Nama Maske, died through L.Rs.
Applicants
Versus
MIDC, Latur & another
Respondents
Mr.V.D.Gunale, advocate for applicants. Mr.S.S.Dande, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Joshi, A.G.P. For Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 23rd December, 2016
PER COURT:
This is an application for bringing on record legal heirs of deceased applicant (Respondent No.1 in First Appeal).
Heard. For the reasons recorded in the application, application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed. Legal heirs of deceased applicant – original Respondent No.1 in appeal, are permitted to be brought on record. Delay occurred in the application is condoned. Abatement, if any, is set aside.
Civil Application stands disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE
(R.M.BORDE)
adb/ca1656716
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application to bring legal heirs of a deceased applicant on record needs to be allowed.
Babu s/o Nama Maske (l.r.s.)
MIDC, Latur
R.M.BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
