Partly allowed

Sardar Bashirkhan Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC7 Sept 2016APPLN/2394/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court bench considered eight bail applications arising from related criminal appeals where accused were on trial without bail. After perusing evidence, the Court found prima facie that trial court findings were sustainable and rejected the bail applications.

What did the court decide?

Bail applications were rejected; original record directed to be sent to Additional Sessions Judge, Latur for paper book preparation.

Sardar Bashirkhan Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

2394.16appln+

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2394 OF 2016
IN APEAL/284/2016 WITH APEAL/284/2016 WITH
APEAL/442/2016 WITH APPLN/3211/2016 IN
APEAL/442/2016 WITH APPLN/3252/2016

¶6

SARDAR BASHIRKHAN PATHAN

¶7

VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶8

...

¶9

Advocates for Applicants : Mr. S.J. Salunke &
Mr. Satej S. Jadhav
APP for State : Mr.S.W. Munde

¶10

...

¶11

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: September 07, 2016

¶12

PER COURT :-

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing
for the applicants.

¶14

2.Perused the notes of evidence.
During the trial, the accused were not on
bail. Upon considering the evidence on record
in its entirety, prima facie, the findings
recorded by the trial Court appear to be
sustainable. In that view of the matter, we
are not inclined to entertain the
applications for grant of bail. Therefore,

¶15

2394.16appln+

¶16

¶17

the applications for grant of bail are
rejected.

¶18

3.The Registry of this Court to send
the original Record and Proceedings to the
Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Latur.
Upon receiving the original Record and
Proceedings, the Registry of the concerned
court to prepare the paper book and send it
back to the Registry of this Court along with
original Record and Proceedings, as early as
possible, and preferably within three months
from today.

¶19

4.Upon receiving the paper book,
liberty to the learned counsel appearing for
the applicants to mention for early hearing
of the appeals.

¶20

SGA

Sardar Bashirkhan Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sardar Bashirkhan Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Radhakisan Jakhete and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Ganesh S/O Pandurang Gavande and Other Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Maroti S/O. Mariba Gujalwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Digambar S/O Krushna Jadhav and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jitendra S/O Lilachand Patil and Other Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bhausaheb Nana Gite Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.