In this criminal writ petition, the Court granted liberty to the petitioners to file an application for discharge before the concerned Court, setting a two-week deadline for filing and a six-week deadline for the trial court to decide.
Liberty granted to petitioners to file an application for discharge within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp395.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2016
Rajendra Radhakisan Jakhete
and another
...Petitioners
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and another
...Respondents
.....
Shri K.C.Sant, advocate for the petitioners
Shri A.R.Borulkar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1
Shri G.V.Wani, advocate for respondent no.2
.....
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE
AND
SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.
DATED: 30.08.2016
PER COURT :
Learned counsel appearing for the parties
inform this Court that charge sheet is filed on
7.6.2016. Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners, therefore, seeks liberty to file
application for discharge before the concerned
Court.
2crwp395.16
Petition is disposed of, with liberty to the
petitioners to take out appropriate application
for discharge before the concerned Court in case
charge is not already framed.
application within two weeks from today, the
concerned Court to decide the same, as
expeditiously as possible, however, within six
weeks from filing of such application, in
accordance with law, in case charge is not already
framed.
available only if the petitioners prefer the
application for discharge within two weeks from
today.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
dbm/crwp395.16
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioners to file an application for discharge.
Whether to specify time limits for the concerned Court to decide such application.
Rajendra Radhakisan Jakhete
The State of Maharashtra
S.S.SHINDE
SANGITRAO S.PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court