Ganesh S/O Pandurang Gavande and Other v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for adjournment rejected; court advised applicants to seek discharge separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crap1791.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1791 OF 2016
Ganesh s/o Pandurang Gavande
and others...Applicants
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and another...Respondents
.....
Shri R.M.Gaikwad, advocate h/f
Shri P.M.Gaikwad, advocate for the applicants
Shri D.R.Kale, A.P.P. for respondent no.1
Shri R.V.Gore, advocate for respondent no.2
.....
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE
AND
SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.
DATED: 30.08.2016
PER COURT :
Learned A.P.P. informs that the charge
sheet is filed in the month of April, 2016. The
applicants did not bother to take exception to the
said charge sheet. Once again prayer is made for
adjournment. Same stands refused. In case, the
applicants are advised, they can take out an
application for discharge before the concerned
2crap1791.16
Court. We are not inclined to entertain this
application. Hence, the application stands
rejected.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
dbm/crap1791.16
Ganesh s/o Pandurang Gavande
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court