The applicant, originally convicted under section 302 IPC, applied for bail. The High Court rejected the application, noting no fresh grounds existed after a previous rejection citing assault on the deceased with weapons.
Application for bail is rejected due to absence of fresh grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.891.2016_903.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.891 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.893 OF 2015
Chotelal Rambrij Paswan ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Prosper D'souza, Advocate appointed for the Applicant
Mrs.U.V. Kejriwal, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 21, 2016
P.C.:
1. Heard both sides.
1 / 2
appa.891.2016_903.doc
brought to our notice to necessitate reconsideration of the prayer for bail.
Hence, the application is rejected.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by the applicant convicted under section 302 IPC should be reconsidered in the absence of fresh grounds.
Chotelal Rambrij Paswan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula BhATkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
