The Bombay High Court condoned an 82-day delay in filing a criminal appeal preferred through jail, allowing the application in the interest of justice.
The application for condonation of delay of 82 days was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.886.2016_901.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.886 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. 462 OF 2016
Bhagwat Putalya Pawar ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Prosper D'souza, advocate appointed for the Applicant Mr.H.J. Dedia, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 21, 2016
P.C.:
filing the appeal. In view of the fact that the appeal has been preferred through jail and the other facts and circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that the delay ought to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 82 days in filing the criminal appeal should be condoned.
Bhagwat Putalya Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
