The applicant sought to carry forward his furlough period from 2014. Holding that Rule 2 of the Prisons Rules prevents carry-forward of ungranted furlough periods, this court rejected the application for carrying forward the requested leave.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12. cri appw 102-16.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3366 OF 2015
Kishor Balkrishna Mhatre
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Prosper D'Souza | Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant |
| Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JULY 20, 2016.
P.C.:
2. The applicant preferred an application for furlough on
10.11.2014. The said application for furlough came to be
rejected on 30.3.2015. Being aggrieved thereby, the
applicant preferred an appeal. The said appeal came to be
dismissed by order dated 8.6.2015, hence, this application.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
12. cri appw 102-16.doc
released on parole leave for a period of 30 days. Thereafter, on 6.5.2016, the applicant was released on furlough.
furlough shall not be carried forward but shall lapse."
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for furlough preferred in 2014 can be carried forward if not granted then.
Kishor Balkrishna Mhatre
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
