A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's advocate failing to furnish true copies of pleadings despite notice and telephone contact. The rule was discharged with the interim order allowed to continue for one month.
Rule discharged; interim order to continue for one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.756 OF 1999
Bankaprasad B. Gupta ..Petitioner. V/s.
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Ors.
..Respondents.
None for the petitioners. Mrs. Geeta Jogalekar for the respondent-BMC. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the respondent-State..
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATED : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2015
P.C. :-
I certify that this Judgment / Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment / Order.
Bankaprasad B. Gupta
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai
A.S. Oka
V.L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
