This judgment disposed of a writ petition seeking a time-bound programme for a pending 2007 suit in the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, by granting liberty to file an application before the concerned court.
Permission granted to move an application before the concerned court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-7812.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7812 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Suresh Chand Ramgopal Gupta in person. Ms. Gauri Rao, AGP for the Respondent No.8.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & V.LACHLIYA, JJ DATED : 4TH SEPTEMBER 2015
P.C.:
. Heard the Petitioner appearing in persons.
The grievance in this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is that the suit of the year 2007 filed by the Respondent is still pending in the Small Causes Court, Mumbai. The prayer in this Petition is for fixing a time-bound programme for the disposal of the suit. A judicial notice of the fact will have to be taken that the Small Causes Court is having large pendency of older suits and proceedings than the suits of the year 2007. Therefore, it is for
2wp-7812.15
ash
the Court before which the suit is pending to decide whether priority deserves to be given to the suit of the year 2007. The contention of the Petitioner appearing in person that the suit has been already expedited. If that be so, the Petitioner should have no grievance. By granting liberty to the Petitioner to move appropriate Application before the concerned Court, we dispose of this Petition.
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
3
wp-7812.15
ash
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a time-bound programme must be fixed for disposal of a pending suit.
Petitioner
Respondent
A.S. OKA
V.LACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court