The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition. The two-judge bench held that the petition could not be filed on the Appellate Side as the cause of action arose in Mumbai and no substantive relief was claimed, limiting the fear to interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-8894.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8894 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Kamalakar L. Koli for the Petitioner. Shri N.A. Ghatte for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & V.LACHLIYA, JJ DATED : 4TH SEPTEMBER 2015
P.C.:
. Not on board. Taken on board.
2
wp-8894.15
ash
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition could be filed on the Appellate Side given that the entire cause of action arose in Mumbai.
Ash
Respondent No. 2
A. S. Oka
V. Lachliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court