The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition after the respondent counsel satisfied the court that the demanded documents will be provided within two weeks. Pending civil applications were also disposed of.
Documents to be handed over within two weeks; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6507.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6507 OF 2013 WITH CA/8937/2014 IN WP/6507/2013
KIRAN JAGANNATH KHADKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Wani Girish V. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mrs. M..A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. V.P. Patil
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 16th APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
rlj/
wp6507.13
-2-
Kiran Jagannath Khadke
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
V. K. JadHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
