Petitioner sought writ directions for an enquiry into alleged substandard road construction. Court noted MSRDC stated damages were negligible and defects within the three-year liability period. Court held no cognizance warranted. Petition rejected as devoid of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1} wp 4064.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4064 OF 2015
Vijayraj Avinash Ambhore Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
Mr.S.D. Karkare advocate for the petitioner Mr.D.R. Kale, GP for Respondent State
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ Dated : 15th April, 2015.
PER COURT :-
1 The petitioner is praying for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 4, to hold an enquiry, in respect of alleged substandard work of construction of road, carried out by the contractor through M.S.R.D.C. Limited.
2 It has been informed by MSRDC that, the total damages are to the extent of 0.12% and the defects pointed out are quite negligible. Apart from this, the defect liability period, prescribed under the terms of tender, is of three years and the contractor is obliged to ratify the defects, if any.
wp 4064.15.odt
{2}
vbd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition regarding alleged substandard road construction warrants issuance of directions for an enquiry.
Vijayraj Avinash Ambhore
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
