On representations made by the respondent, the court held the petitioner's grievance regarding auction of shops as redressed. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without any substantive litigation or order.
Petitioner's grievance held as redressed by respondent's assurance; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 4023.15.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4023 OF 2015
Devanand Krishnarao Borse
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
Mr.A.R. Syed advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Kale, GP for Respondent No.1 Mr. P.P. Chavan advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ Dated : 15th April, 2015.
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 Agricultural Produce Market Committee, makes a statement, on instructions that, the process for holding auction of the constructed shops, would be undertaken within a period of four weeks from today and process of auction and allotment of shops to the successful bidders, would be completed within a period of two months from today.
2 In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3, on instructions, the grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant petition, stands redressed. Writ petition stands disposed of.
(V.K. JADHAV, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)
vbd
Devanand Krishnarao Borse
The State of Maharashtra
Agricultural Produce Market Committee
R.M. Borde
V.K. JadHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
