Challenge against tender issuance for sanitation job was rejected as the writ petition was filed belatedly after three years when the successful bidder was already executing the work.
Writ petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3572 OF 2015
BHANGI MEHTAR SAMAJ SARVANGIN VIKAS MANDAL, NANDED VERSUS THE DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION LTD, MUMBAI A
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shinde Ashish B
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 16th APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
The petitioner is challenging the action of issuance of tender for doing sanitation job at State Transport Bus Station at Loha. On perusal of communication dated 13.6.2012 issued by the Divisional Engineer, it is noticed that the tender offered by one Balaji Bahuuddeshiya Seva, Aurangabad has been accepted in the month of April, 2012 itself. The successful bidder has been awarded the tender work and is continuing to execute the work since last three years. The successful bidder has also not been impleaded as party respondent in the petition. The petition, presented belatedly after about three years from the date of issuance of work order in favour of successful bidder, does not deserve consideration. Writ petition, as such, stands rejected.
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed three years after the issuance of the work order deserves consideration.
BHANGI MEHTAR SAMAJ SARVANGIN VIKAS MANDAL, NANDED
DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION LTD, MUMBAI
R. M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
