Three linked writ petitions were disposed of by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, as the relief claimed varied too extensively over the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5379.07
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5379 OF 2007
Laxman Limbraj Bodhale
and another.
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.N.R. Karankar Advocate for Petitioners.
Mrs.M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 & 2
Mr.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Resp. No.3
...
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5380 OF 2007
Nagnath Basanna Patil
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.V.R. Dhorde Advocate h/f. Mr. R.L. Kute
Advocate for Petitioner.
Mrs.M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 & 2
Mr.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Resp. No.3
...
wp5379.07
2
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5405 OF 2007
Sambhaji s/o Diliprao Patil
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.A.N. Irpatgire Advocate for Petitioner.
Mrs.M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 & 2
Mr.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Resp. No.3.
Mr.V.D. Hon Advocate for Resp. No.5.
...
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 19TH MARCH, 2015
ORDER :
. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submit
that with the passage of time the relief claimed
in the present Petitions does not survive. Writ
Petitions, as such, disposed of. Rule discharged.
No costs.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
asb/MAR15
Laxman Limbraj Bodhale
Nagnath Basanna Patil
Sambhaji s/o Diliprao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court