This order disposes of Writ Petition No. 273 of 2008 by holding that the purpose of the petition was already served by an earlier interim order dated 15.02.2008. The Rule is discharged with no costs.
The writ petition is disposed of; Rule discharged. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP273.08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 273 OF 2008
Sunita Rajesh Baheti .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Another .. Respondents
Shri R. F. Totala, Advocate for the Petitioner Shri S. G. Sangle, A. G. P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 18TH MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT :
[ A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
sam/March. 15
Sunita Rajesh Baheti
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
