Disposed

Kalawatibai Papanna Karkhelikar v. the State Election Commission and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Mar 2015LPA/295/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of multiple writ petitions and letters patent appeals as infructuous because the underlying matters were already disposed of. Prayers were rendered infructuous, rule discharged, and pending civil applications were disposed of without costs.

What did the court decide?

Rule discharged; petitions/ appeals disposed as infructuous; pending civil applications disposed of.

Kalawatibai Papanna Karkhelikar Vs the State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp5400.07

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.5400 OF 2007

¶6

Sambhaji s/o Diliprao Patil

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

 VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra
and others.

¶10

...RESPONDENTS

¶11

...

¶12

 Mr.A.N. Irpatgire Advocate for Petitioner.
 Mr.S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 & 2
 Mr.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Resp. No.3
 Mr.V.R. Dhorde Advocate h/f. Mr. R.N. Dhorde
 Advocate for Resp. No.4.
 Mr. V.D. Hon Advocate for Resp. No.5.

¶13

...

¶14

WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO.5402 OF 2007

¶16

Sambhaji s/o Diliprao Patil

¶17

...PETITIONER

¶18

 VERSUS

¶19

The State of Maharashtra
and others.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

wp5400.07

¶22

¶23

...

¶24

 Mr.A.N. Irpatgire Advocate for Petitioner.
 Mrs.M.S. Patni, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 & 2
 Mr.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Resp. No.3
 Mr.R.A. Tambe Advocate for Resp. No.4.
 Mr. V.D. Hon Advocate for Resp. No.5.

¶25

 ...
 WITH

¶26

 WRIT PETITION NO.5404 OF 2007

¶27

Sambhaji s/o Diliprao Patil

¶28

...PETITIONERS

¶29

 VERSUS

¶30

The State of Maharashtra
and others.

¶31

...RESPONDENTS

¶32

...

¶33

 Mr.A.N. Irpatgire Advocate for Petitioner.
 Mrs.M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 & 2
 Mr.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Resp. No.3.
 Mr.R.A. Tambe Advocate for Resp. No.4.
 Mr.V.D. Hon Advocate for Resp. No.5.

¶34

...

¶35

WITH

¶36

 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.294 OF 2010
 IN
 WRIT PETITION NO.7712 OF 2010

¶37

Rukmin w/o Anil Kavadewar

¶38

...APPELLANT

¶39

 VERSUS

¶40

The State Election Commission,
Maharashtra State,
Through its Commissioner
and others.

¶41

...RESPONDENTS

¶42

wp5400.07

¶43

¶44

...

¶45

 Mr.A.N. Irpatgire Advocate for Appellant.
 Mr. S.T. Shelke Advocate for Resp. No.1.
 Mr.S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for Resp. No. 2.
 Mr.M.S. Deshmukh Advocate for Resp. No.3

¶46

...

¶47

WITH

¶48

 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.295 OF 2010
 IN
 WRIT PETITION NO.7703 OF 2010

¶49

Kalawatibai w/o Papanna Karkhelikar

¶50

...APPELLANT
 VERSUS

¶51

The State Election Commission,
Maharashtra State,
Through its Commissioner
and others.

¶52

...RESPONDENTS

¶53

...

¶54

 Mr.A.N. Irpatgire Advocate for Appellant.
 Mr.S.T. Shelke Advocate for Resp. No.1.
 Mrs.M.S. Patni, A.G.P. for Resp. No. 2.
 Mr.M.S. Deshmukh Advocate for Resp. No.3.

¶55

...

¶56

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
 A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

¶57

 DATE : 19TH MARCH, 2015

¶58

wp5400.07

¶59

¶60

ORDER :

¶61

1. Mr. Irpatgire, learned counsel for the
Petitioners/Appellants states that the prayers
made in the present Petitions and Appeals are
rendered infructuous. All the Writ Petitions and

¶62

Appeals as such, disposed of. Rule discharged. No
costs.

¶63

2.Pending Civil Applications stand disposed

¶64

of.

¶65

[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
asb/MAR15

Kalawatibai Papanna Karkhelikar v. the State Election Commission and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalawatibai Papanna Karkhelikar v. the State Election Commission and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Rajesh Baheti Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rajashri Shahu Trust and Anr. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Ramesh Narayandas Karva Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

The Maharashtra Rajya Vratpatra Sampadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rukmin Anil Kavadewar Vs the State Election Commission and Ors.

Padmabai Genaji Rakh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.