The writ petition was declared infructuous and consequently disposed of without costs by the Court.
Rule discharged. No costs. Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP848.08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 848 OF 2008
Rajarshi Shahu Trust and Another .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents
Shri P. G. Borade h/f Shri V. D. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioners
Shri S. G. Sangle, A. G. P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Shri P. S. Dighe, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3 Shri V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 18TH MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT :
The learned counsel for the petitioners states that, the writ petition has become infructuous. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs.
[ A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
sam/March. 15
Rajarshi Shahu Trust
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
