This writ petition allowed leave to amend and transferred the case to the Original Side bearing that the entire cause of action arose in Mumbai, with a stay on impugned orders pending amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-493.15.doc
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.493 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders.
Mr. Vaibhav Joglekar i/by Mr. Yatin R. Shah, for Petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mrs. Sharmila U. Deshmukh, for Respondent No.2. Mrs. M.R. Bhoir, for Respondent Nos.6 and 7.
CORAM: A.S.OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE: 14th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:-
Not on board. Taken on board.
. We grant leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. As the entire cause of action for filing the Petition has arisen in Mumbai, we transfer the Petition to the Original Side. Consequential amendments shall be carried out by the Petitioner. For a period of
1 of 2
wp-493.15.doc
one week from today, no action shall be taken on the basis of the impugned order dated 23rd December, 2014.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(A.S.OKA, J.)
2 of 2
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 3
Respondent No.2
Respondent Nos.6 and 7
A.S.OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
