those persons who are in the employment of the State Government on the date on which amendment to the statute was made. In the said communication, it is further stated that considering the decision of the Apex Court in C.A. No.2026 of 2000, the premises will be de-requisitioned and, therefore, the original allottee was called upon to vacate the premises. It is pertinent to note that the present petitioner is claiming to be a legal representative of the original allottee. In the reply to the notice issued on 17th September, 2008, the petitioner relied upon the amendment made to the said Act as well as to the relevant Rent Control Act. On 3rd May, 2011 the Controller of Accommodation passed an order of eviction against the petitioner in exercise of the powers under sub-section (1) of section 8C of the said Act on the ground that the petitioner was in unauthorised possession of the said premises. The said order also records that the premises need not be continued under requisition. Therefore, the order of eviction was passed against the petitioner. The petitioner preferred a statutory appeal under section 8-D of the Act. By order dated 25th May, 2012, the said appeal was dismissed by the appellate authority. In the said order, it is recorded that the said premises was required to be derequisitioned.
