Disposed

M v. Sugars and Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Madhav Kulkarni v Union of India and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Jan 2015WP/476/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Punjab and Haryana Civil Appellate Jurisdiction (likely Bombay based on text) disposed of a writ petition by accepting the petitioner's counsel's undertaking to file a reply and directing the appropriate authority to decide the show cause notice within a month, with a stay on execution. The court declined to adjudicate on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to file a reply within 10 days; Appropriate Authority to decide within 1 month; stay of execution of adverse order for 3 weeks.

M v Sugars and Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. through Its… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp-476.15.doc

¶2

pmw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.476 OF 2015

¶5

M V Sugars and Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs.

¶6

Union of India and Ors.

¶7

Petitioner

¶8

Respondents

¶9

Mr. V.P. Sawant i/by Mr. Prabhakar Manohar Jadhav, for Petitioner. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Mr. Vinod Joshi, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP, for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.

¶10

CORAM: A.S.OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ. DATE: 14^th JANUARY, 2015

¶11

P.C.:-

¶12

Not on board. Taken on board.

¶13

. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. We have also heard the learned appearing for the first and second Respondents. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions, states that a reply will be filed to the show cause notice at Exhibit K within a period of 10 days from today. We accept the statement. Considering the urgency pointed out, we propose to direct the first and second Respondents to pass an order on the show cause notice within the time stipulated under this order.

¶14

1 of 3

¶15

wp-476.15.doc

¶16

Hence, we dispose of the Petition by passing the following

¶17

order :-

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(i) We accept the statement of the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner that a reply to the impugned show cause notice (Exhibit- K) will be filed within a period of 10 days from today;

¶20

(ii) If a reply is filed within a period of 10 days from today, the Appropriate Authority of the first Respondent shall pass appropriate order on the show cause notice in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of one month from the date on which the reply is filed;

¶21

(iii) The order passed on the show cause notice be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of one week from the date of passing of the order;

¶22

(iv)If the order on show cause notice be adverse to the Petitioner, the same shall not be acted upon for a period of three weeks from the date on which the communication of the order is served on the Petitioner;

¶23

(v)We make it clear that we have made no adjudication on the merits of the show cause notice;

¶24

2 of 3

¶25

wp-476.15.doc

¶26

(v) The Petition is disposed of on above terms;

¶27

(vi) All concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this

order.

(A.K. MENON, J.)

(A.S.OKA, J.)

3 of 3

M v. Sugars and Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Madhav Kulkarni v Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M v. Sugars and Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Madhav Kulkarni v Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kadar Ismail Harun Vs Controller of Accommodation and Ors.

Rahul Rasiklal Nahar and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Prabhakar Tulshiram Phlkhe and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Ors.

Miss Jasmit Kaur D/O Harvinder Chawla Vs Versova Andheri Priyankar Co-Operative Housing Society Limited and Ors.

Shri. Jugai Minerals and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sudhakar Babu Uchil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.