This court disposed of a writ petition by directing the appropriate authority of the first respondent to decide the petitioners' pending application filed in January 2011 within six weeks, explicitly stating no adjudication on merits was made.
Direction to dispose of the pending application expeditiously within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-395.15.doc
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.395 OF 2015
Shri Jugai Minerals and Anr.
Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents
Mr. Sachin Keru Hande, for Petitioners. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP, for Respondent No.1. Ms. Purnima Awasthi a/w Ms. S.I. Shah, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: A.S.OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE: 14th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:-
Not on board. Taken on board.
. The learned AGP, on instructions, states that the application made by the Petitioners on 24th January, 2011 is still pending.
ORDER
(i) We direct the appropriate authority of the first Respondent to dispose of the application filed on 24th January, 2011 as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six weeks from today. No further time shall be granted;
1 of 2
wp-395.15.doc
(iii) All concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this
order.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(A.S.OKA, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by directing the appropriate authority to decide the pending application expeditiously.
Jugai Minerals and Anr.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
