Disposed

Sayyad Arbaj Husain v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC20 Jan 2015WP/29/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Writ Petition seeking direction to decide a pending representation regarding service matters. The court directed the second respondent to decide the representation expeditiously within three weeks but clarified that no opinion on the merits was expressed, leaving the matter for the authorities to decide.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the pending representation filed on 15.12.2014 within three weeks.

Sayyad Arbaj Husain Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

Cr.WP 29.15

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.29 OF 2015

¶5

SAYYAD ARBAJ HUSAIN.

¶6

...PETITIONER..

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER.

¶9

...RESPONDENTS...

¶10

 .....

¶11

Shri N.B. Narawade, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar, APP for Respondent/State.

¶12

 .....

¶13

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

¶14

DATE: 20.01.2015

¶15

ORDER :

¶16

1] Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

2]This petition is disposed of with a direction to the
respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated
15.12.2014 filed by the petitioner, if pending, as
expeditiously as possible and preferably within three
weeks from the date of receipt of order of this Court.
3]We make it clear that we have not expressed any
opinion on merits of said representation and it is left
to the said authority to decide the same on merits and in
accordance with law.

¶18

ndk/ cr201158.doc

Sayyad Arbaj Husain v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayyad Arbaj Husain v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaffar Pashamiyan Deshmukh Vs the State of Mah

Mahaurja Vidhyut Tantric Seva Sahkari Sanstha, Hingoli Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sapana Damjibhai Vasava Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Suresh Namdeorao Bankar Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Narhari S/O Balaji Gutte

1 Mangal S/O Narayan Giri and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.