This order on a criminal appeal records that the applicant's counsel requests discharge after advice from the client not to prosecute the appeal. The alternate prayer to list for final hearing is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2015 IN APEAL/478/2012 WITH APEAL/478/2012
GAFFAR PASHAMIYAN DESHMUKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhaya R. Rathod APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.D. Kaldate
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 19TH JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard. Counsel for the appellant submits that father of the appellant/accused has instructed him not to appear in the matter since they do not want to prosecute the appeal. Therefore, the counsel prays that his appearance may be discharged from the appeal.
2] Perused the application. The alternate prayer of the applicant is to fix the appeal for hearing is allowed. Already, the appeal is included in the cause list of final hearing cases at Sr. No. 244. In case the appellant is ready, this court is ready to take up the appeal for hearing as per the request of the appellant. Prayer for bail cannot be considered as already the application for bail has been disposed of as not pressed. Advocate for the appellant is free to take appropriate steps in accordance with the High Court Appellate Side Rules, for his discharge.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Gaffar Pashamiyan Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
