High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition regarding a petitioner's retention in service post-interim order upon reaching superannuation age.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1999.03
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1999 OF 2003
Balbhim s/o Damodhar Kumbhar,
Age-52 years, Occu:Service,
R/o-Takrarwadi (Bhigwan),
Tq-Indapur, Dist-Pune
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.M.S. Taur Advocate h/f. Mr. A.N. Kakade
Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr.S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 to 3.
...
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 19TH MARCH, 2015
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on
instructions, states that pursuant to the interim
order passed by this Court, the Petitioner was
continued in service and on attaining the age of
wp1999.03
2
superannuation has retired.
2.In light of that the Writ Petition stands
disposed of in terms of the interim orders passed.
Rule disposed of. No costs.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
asb/MAR15
Balbhim s/o Damodhar Kumbhar
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court