In Public Interest Litigation No. 77/2010, the court disposed of the matter noting the petitioner's in-person appearance and death, rendering the PIL infructuous.
The PIL was disposed of as infructuous due to the petitioner's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.01.pil.77.10.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 77/2010 (G.C.Singh vs,. Govt.of Maharashtra and another )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mrs.Kalyani Deshpande,AGP for respondents 1 and 2 Mr. A.A.Naik, Adv.for respondent no.3
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 14th January, 2015.
Perusal of the prayer clauses would reveal that by efflux of time, the Public Interest Litigation is rendered infructous.
Apart from that, the petitioner who was appearing in-person, is no more surviving. P.I.L. is therefore, disposed of.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
G.C. SINGH
GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA
B.R.GAVAI
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court