The court rejected the appellant's application, finding that the appellant was thoroughly negligent in prosecuting the proceedings and that no case was made out for invoking discretionary jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13012015caono.196.2013 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application (O) No. 196 of 2013 in Misc. C.A.St. No.1951 of 2013 in C.A. (Z) No. 412 of 2013 in LPA St.No. 14298 of 2011 in W.P.No. 4536 of 2009.
The Peoples Education Society vs. Raziya Sultana Abdul Salim and others.
Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders.
Mr.C.V.Kale, Advocate for appellant. Mr. B.G.Kulkarni, Adv. for R-1 to 11.
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI & MRS. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 13.1.2015
From the conduct of the appellant, it appears that
the appellant has been thoroughly negligent in prosecuting the proceedings in this Court. We do not find that case is made out for invoking the discretionary jurisdiction. The application is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
patle
13012015caono.196.2013 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application requires invocation of discretionary jurisdiction given the conduct of the appellant.
The Peoples Education Society
Raziya Sultana Abdul Salim
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Mridula R. Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
