Allowed

Ranchandra S/O Shivnath Paswan v. Niranjansingh S/O Dilipsing and Anor.

Bombay HC13 Jan 2015CAO/526/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing for restoration of a first appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, conditioning it on the appellant not claiming interest for the delay period and filing private paper books within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application for condonation of delay allowed, subject to no interest for delay period and filing of private paper books within four weeks.

Ranchandra S/O Shivnath Paswan Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

13012015caono.526.2014 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

Civil Application (O) No. 526 of 2014 in M.C.A.No. /2014 in F.A.No. 1094 of 2007

¶4

Ramchandra s/o Shivnath Paswan vs. Niranjan Singh s/o Dilip Singh and another.

¶5

Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶6

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders.

¶7

Mr. D.R.Rupnarayan, Adv. for applicant. Mr. C.A.Anthony, Adv. for R-2.

¶8

CORAM: B.R.GAVAI & MRS. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 13.1.2015

¶9

This application is for condonation of delay in filing

¶10

the application for restoration of the first appeal, which came to be dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶11

This application is vehemently opposed by Mr. C.A.Anthony, the learned counsel for respondent no.2, on the ground that the delay is not at all sufficiently explained.

¶12

Perusal of the application would reveal that the counsel, who was appointed by the applicant/ appellant, had joined the judicial service, but, however, had not informed him

¶13

13012015caono.526.2014 2

¶14

about his inability to continue with the brief. The applicant/ appellant was, therefore, required to contract another counsel and filed the present application.

¶15

Taking into consideration the grounds raised in the application, we are inclined to allow the application. Hence, the application for condonation of delay is allowed, however, subject to condition that in the event, this Court allows the appeal and enhance the compensation already awarded, the appellant would not be entitled to any interest for the period between the date on which appeal came to be dismissed for want of prosecution and the date on which the application for restoration is made.

¶16

Misc. Civil Application St. No. 346 of 2014 in F.A.No. 1094 of 2007:

¶17

This application for restoration of the first appeal, is taken on Board. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The First Appeal is restored to file on the condition that the private paper books would be filed within four seeks from today.

¶18

JUDGE JUDGE

¶19

patle

¶20

13012015caono.526.2014 3

Ranchandra S/O Shivnath Paswan v. Niranjansingh S/O Dilipsing and Anor.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranchandra S/O Shivnath Paswan v. Niranjansingh S/O Dilipsing and Anor.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Vitthal Bakade Vs Smt. Shakuntala Wd/O Vitthalrao Bakade and 2 Others

Mahesh Vitthal Bakade Vs Smt. Shakuntala Wd/O Vitthalrao Bakade and 2 Others

Chandrashekhar Surjuprasad Shukla Vs M.S.R.T.C. through Its Divisional Traffic Superintendent, M.S.R.T.C. Nagpur and Others

Ranchandra S/O Shivnath Paswan Vs Niranjansingh S/O Dilipsing and Anor.

The Peoples Edun. Soc. Thr. President Dr. Rahim Bharati Vs Raziya Sultana Abdul Salim and 14 Ors.

Sunderlal Sawaji Urban Co. Operative Bank Ltd, Jintur, Thr Its Manager Admin Ashok Babarao Chidra Vs Sudhir Madhuikarao Nakhate and Others