The High Court at Nagpur disposed of Writ Petition No. 2292/2005 by the learned counsel stating that the petition had become infructuous. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2292-05
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2292/2005
(VASANT NARAYAN MANDRE VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 14, 2015.
The learned counsel for the parties state that the petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
VASANT NARAYAN MANDRE
UNION OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
