PIL petition filed by petitioner in person sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to prosecute complaints before authorities. Court granted leave and disposed of petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw PIL petition with liberty to prosecute complaints before authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 28 OF 2012
NAGRAJ JANARDHAN PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Party In Person, represented by
Mr. S B Ghatol Patil (appointed)
Mr. GR Ingole, AGP for Respondents Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5;
Mr. Hon Vinayak D., Adv.for Resp.no. 2
...
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.
Dated: February 05, 2015
...
PER COURT :-
1)Shri SB Ghatol-Patil, amicus curiae appointed in
the matter to represent the party in person, who is present
in the court, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the
PIL petition with liberty to prosecute the complaints lodged
by party in person before various authorities. Counsel
representing the respondents do not have objection for
granting leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted.
The PIL petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
2)The petitioner in person may avail of appropriate
remedies, as permissible under law.
bdv
NAGRAJ JANARDHAN PATIL
THE STATE OF MAH
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court