Dismissed

Kalidas Vithoba Sanap v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC3 Feb 2015WP/9459/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This dispensable writ petition sought relief regarding the determination and payment of rental compensation. The court granted directions to the acquiring authorities to decide the rental amount within 8 weeks and disburse it within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted leave to apply for rental compensation; Respondents directed to decide amount within 8 weeks and pay within 3 months.

Kalidas Vithoba Sanap Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp 9459.14.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.9459 OF 2014

¶5

Kalidas s/o Vithoba Sanap Age: 77 years, occu: agril. R/o Raymoha (old), Tq. Shirur (K), Dist. Beed Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad. 2. The Collector, Beed District: Beed

¶8

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Beed, District: Beed

¶9

The Executive Engineer (E.G.S.) Minor Irrigation Division, Beed. Respondents

¶10

Mr.D.R.Jayabhar advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.K.Kadam, AGP for Respondent State

¶11

CORAM : R.M. BORDE &

¶12

P.R. BORA, JJ Dated : 3^rd February, 2015.

¶13

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: R.M.Borde, J)

¶14

1 Rule. Petition is taken up for final hearing with the consent

{2}

wp 9459.14.odt

of the parties.

2 An application tendered by the petitioner to respondent No.4, claiming rental compensation has not yet been dealt with. The petitioner has made a request for issuance of directions to the concerned respondents to take decision on the application tendered by him for grant of rental compensation. Determination of amount of rental compensation has to be made by respondent No.3 and on such determination, acquiring body i.e. respondent No.4 shall have to pay the amount to the petitioner.

¶19

3 In the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition can be disposed of by granting leave to the petitioner to tender an appropriate application claiming rental compensation to respondent Nos. 2 and 3, within a period of six months from today. After the petitioner tenders an application with respondent Nos.2 and 3, within the time stipulated as above, respondent No.3 shall take decision on the application and determine the amount of rental compensation as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of such application. On determination of the amount of rental compensation, respondent No.4 shall disburse the amount in favour of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and

¶20

wp 9459.14.odt

¶21

{3}

¶22

preferably within a period of three months from the date of such determination.

¶23

4 With the directions as above, writ petition stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

¶24

(P.R. BORA, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)

¶25

vbd

Kalidas Vithoba Sanap v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalidas Vithoba Sanap v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sayyed Sabir Sayyed Motebar Ali Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Kausabai Sandu Jadhav and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gulveersing Bhagwantsingh Kalara and Others Vs Parildas Ferumal Tolani and Others

Sindhpana Matysa Vyavsay Sahakari Sansth Ltd, Beed and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vishal Subhash Thakur Vs the Union of India and Another

Namdeo Janardan Wanjare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others