Disposed

Rauf Nyaju Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC5 Jan 2015PIL/14/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a PIL petition regarding alleged irregularities in Zilla Parishad works. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Commissioner for an enquiry and ordered disposal of the petition with liberty to file a representation.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to tender a representation to the Commissioner for an enquiry. The Commissioner was directed to consider the representation and take action

Rauf Nyaju Patel Vs the State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

(1) PIL NO.14/2014

¶3

13 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 14 OF 2014

¶4

RAUF NYAJU PATEL VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶6

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kakade Amol N . AGP for Respondents:Mr.P.P.More

¶7

Advocate for respondent nos. 4 To 7. Mr. U.B.Bondar

¶8

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: January 05, 2015

¶9

PER COURT :-

¶10

The petitioner is making a grievance in respect of alleged irregularities committed by the officials of the Zilla Parishad in executing certain works in respect of repairs of primary school buildings within Aurangabad district.

¶11

We do not propose to go into the allegations made in the petition and the reply tendered by the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, refuting such allegations. We are of the opinion that the grievance raised in the petition needs to be looked into by the Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, and appropriate action, if warranted, be taken.

¶12

In the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to tender a detailed representation setting forth his grievance to the Commissioner of Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, within a

¶13

AGP/-

¶14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶15

(2) PIL NO.14/2014

¶16

period of two weeks, and further issue instructions to the Commissioner to consider the representation and conduct enquiry, if warranted, and take appropriate action, if deemed necessary, depending upon outcome of enquiry within prescribed period.

¶17

If the petitioner tenders appropriate representation to the Commissioner within a period of two weeks, the Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, shall consider the same and if deemed necessary, take appropriate action as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of presentation of such representation.

¶18

With the directions as above, the petition stands disposed of.

¶19

The petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- to demonstrate his bona fides and it is informed that the amount has been deposited. Learned Counsel for the petitioner graciously submits that, petitioner is not interested in claiming refund of amount and the same be donated to Library of Advocates Association. The amount deposited by the petitioner shall be credited to the account of the High Court Bar Association Library, Aurangabad Bench, Aurangabad; Registry to act accordingly.

¶20

AGP/-

Rauf Nyaju Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rauf Nyaju Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ravindra T. Deoghare and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Dept.of Higher and Technical Education and or

Amol Manohar Ingale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Meenakshi Prabhakar Patil Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Omprakash Bhaurao Kamdi and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra,Thr. Its Secretary, Department of Cooperation and Textiles,Mumbai and 5 Ot

Mr. Prakash Ganpat Sawant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Prakash Ganpat Sawant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Association for Aiding Justice, through Mr. Ram Keswani Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, of Ministry of Education and Ors.

Vidarbha Pradesh Prakalpagrasta Sangharsha Samiti, Thr President, Amravati and Anr. Vs State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Dept of Education, Mumbai and Others

Samarbahadursing Tahasildarsing Dead Thr His Legal Heirs Narangidevi Samarbahadursing and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Manjubai Pravinkumar Khandelwal and Ors. Vs M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Samarbahadursing Tahsildarsing Died Lrs Narangidevi Samar Bahadar Singh and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rajkumar Bapurao Sirsat and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Subhash Vyankatrao Biradar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Devidas Damu Chaudhary Vs Union of India and Others