Dismissed

Vidarbha Pradesh Prakalpagrasta Sangharsha Samiti, Thr President, Amravati and Anr. v. State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Dept of Education, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC7 Jan 2015PIL/16/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this PIL, the petitioners alleged irregularities by the respondents concerning the Education and Food Supplies Departments. The court examined affidavits and found allegations against the Education Department unproven but the State guilty of irregularity in the Midday Meals Scheme, resulting in an imposed penalty.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vidarbha Pradesh Prakalpagrasta Sangharsha Samiti… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

PIL16-10.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

Public Interest Litigation No.16/2010 (Vidarbha Pradesh Prakalpgrasta Sangharsha Samiti and another .vs. State of

¶5

Mah. And others. )

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders

¶7

Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for Petitioners. Mrs. B.H. Dangre, G.P. For Respondents 1,2,5 to 7 Mr. R.M. Bhangde, Advocate for Respondent no.3.

¶8

CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : January 07, 2015.

¶9

The petitioners have filed the public interest litigation contending that various irregularities and illegalities are committed by respondent no.3 and in spite of the representations made in that regard, no steps are taken by the authorities.

¶10

It appears that the complaints of the petitioners pertain to the two departments, one is the Education Department and the other regarding Food Supplies Department.

¶11

Insofar as the complaint pertaining to the matters coming under the jurisdiction of the Education Department is concerned, an affidavit has been filed by Shri Sanjay Manikrao Yadgire, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati stating therein that detailed inquiries were made in respect of the allegations made by the petitioners and upon an inquiry, nothing was found in the matter. It has been categorically stated that petitioner no.2 is in the habit of

¶12

¶13

PIL16-10.odt

¶14

threatening the officers of self immolation and committing suicide by consuming poison.

¶15

Insofar as the complaint pertaining to the matters coming within the jurisdiction of the Food Supplies Department is concerned, the allegations appeared to be pertaining to irregularity in terms of Midday Meals Scheme. In the affidavit dated 30^th July, 2011 filed by Shri R.R. Chandurkar, District Supply Officer, Amaravati, it is categorically stated that the departmental inquiry was conducted into the allegations and in the inquiry, respondent no.3 was found guilty. It has been stated that in the departmental inquiry, a penalty in the tune of Rs.55,748/- was imposed upon respondent no.3.

¶16

In that view of the matter, we find nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of accordingly.

¶17

In view of disposal of PIL, Civil Application Nos. 1590/2010 and 44/2011 also stand disposed of.

¶18

JUDGE

¶19

JUDGE

¶20

halwai

Vidarbha Pradesh Prakalpagrasta Sangharsha Samiti, Thr President, Amravati and Anr. v. State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Dept of Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vidarbha Pradesh Prakalpagrasta Sangharsha Samiti, Thr President, Amravati and Anr. v. State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Dept of Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Prakash Ganpat Sawant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Association for Aiding Justice, through Mr. Ram Keswani Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, of Ministry of Education and Ors.

Mr. Prakash Ganpat Sawant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rauf Nyaju Patel Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Joshi Shivshankar Jathashankar Vs the Superintendent General Stamp Office and 3 Ors.

Arun George Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 4 Others

Vanashakti, a Public Trust and 4 Ors. Vs the Chairman and 3 Ors.

Bhagwanji Raiyani Vs Maharashtra Met. Region Dev. Authority and Ors.

Lakhpatibai W/O Natthulal Gupta (Dead) through Lrs. Sau. Meerabai W/O Shrikirshna Gupta and 2 Other Vs Smt. Jotshna Wd/O Suresh Saikhede and Others

Subhas S/O Santosh Charpe and Ors. Vs Santosh S/O Pandurang Charpe and Anr.

Chanda Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Another. Vs Murlidhar Kashinath Dange and Another.

Anil Shamsundar Agre Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Shri Paramjeet Singh Kalsi Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary (Transport) Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Sandeep Santosh Anjankar Vs Sau. Vaishali @ Sukhada W/O Sandeep Anjankar