The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad held a civil application filed by a Tahsildar and others against the State of Maharashtra to be misconceived.
Application rejected as it is misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca9850.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9850 OF 2015
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 779 OF 2007
Samar Bahadar Sing Tahsildar & others .. APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, advocate for applicants. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2015
PER COURT :
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Samar Bahadar Sing Tahsildar & others
The State of Maharashtra & others
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
