The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of four connected writ petitions by extending the time to serve copies of this order to the parties by one week. Sets a deadline for service completion for these initial proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
G.A.Ghule [P.A.]
1/2
517.14 with ors.Bhatta Matters.sxw
`IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
P.I.L. 141/2014.
AMOL; MANOHAR INGALE & ORS. V/S. THE STATE OF MAHA. & ORS.
CONT. PETITION NO. 517 OF 2014
IN WP/5605/2012
PRAVIN VASUDEO KHADKE AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Shendurnikar Pushkar S.
WRIT PETITION NO. 8053 OF 2014
CHANDRAKANT VINAYAKRAO INGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Nagargoje Ankush N.
WRIT PETITION NO. 10857 OF 2014
PRIYADARSHINI MAHILA NAGARI SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED, BEED
VERSUS
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Patil Milind
WRIT PETITION NO. 10998 OF 2014
SURYABHAN NARAYAN JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Patil B.N.
2/2 517.14 with ors.Bhatta Matters.sxw
CORAM : B.P. Dharmadhikari & A.M. Badar, JJ.
DATE : 23rd December, 2014.
Per Court :-
Time to pay bhatta is extended by one week. Service be completed on Respondents by 11/02/15. If service is not completed, matter shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Amol Manohar Ingaile & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Pravin Vasdeo Khadke & Others
The State of Maharashtra
Chandrakant Vinayakrao Inge
The State of Maharashtra & Others
B.P. Dharmadhikari
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
