Vidya R.Amonkar and 2 Ors. v. Uday N.Gaitonde and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-CP-6-14.DOC
Sharayu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 6 OF 2014
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 7589 OF 2012 IN
SUIT NO. 369 OF 2012
…Plaintiffs
Vidya R. Amonkar & 2 Ors.…Plaintiffs
Versus
Uday N. Gaitonde & 4 Ors.…Defendants
Ms. Pallavi Divekar, i/b M/s. Divekar & Co. for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Burhan Bukhari, for the Defendants Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Mehul Gada, i/b M/s. Tamhane & Co., for the Defendant No. 3.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 12th February 2015
PC:-
1.In view of the Consent Terms filed in the Suit No. 369 of
2012, the Contempt Petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with no
order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Vidya R. Amonkar & 2 Ors.
Uday N. Gaitonde & 4 Ors.
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court