Achyutbhai Hiralal Shah v. Princess Ujawala Raje
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition erred as the petitioner died without substitution, leading to abatement of the miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913-MPT-17-11.DOC
Agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONNO. 17 OF 2011
Achyutbhai Hiralal Shah…Petitioner
Versus
Princess Ujawala Raje...Respondent
Mr. Smpanna Walawalkar, i/b B. B. Parekh, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Karl Tamboly, a/w P. Yonzen, A. Rebello, i/b Bharucha &
Partners.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 13th February 2015
PC:-
1.The Petitioner in this Revocation Petition passed away on
28th May 2013. None have come forward to be substituted in his
place. The Miscellaneous Petition has abated and is disposed of as
such.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Achyutbhai Hiralal Shah
Princess Ujawala Raje
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court