The petition challenged an election matter. The High Court observed that the petitioner did not appear, the cause was rendered infructuous due to the election being held, and disposed of the writ petition with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp925-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No. 925 OF 2014
Sunil s/o Gulabrao Janorkar
Vrs.
State of Mah. Through its Secretary and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
None for the petitioner. Shri Thakre, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 26th AUGUST , 2014 .
None appeared for the petitioner on 19.8.2014. None appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the cause for filing this writ petition must have been rendered infructuous as the election is already held.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is
disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Sunil s/o Gulabrao Janorkar
State of Mah. Through its Secretary and others
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
