This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2925-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2925/2014
(RESHAM DADAJI RANDIVE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri A.B. Mirza, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.K. Pathan, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2. Shri G.G. Mishra, counsel for the R-3 & 4.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2014.
Shri G.G. Mishra, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4, states that the petitioner has an alternate remedy of approaching the Divisional Commissioner against the transfer order.
In view of the objection, Shri A.B. Mirza, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner would avail the alternate remedy.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
The points raised in the petition are kept open.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Resham Dadaji Randive
The State of Mah.
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
