Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition alleging D.R.A.T. had commenced functioning at Mumbai, enabling prosecution of his appeal there.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
249wp835.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
WRIT PETITION NO. 835 OF 2014
(Bharat s/o Dattatraya Jog vs. State Bank of India & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Shri P.S. Khubalkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.A. Chauhan, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P.R. BORA, JJ. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (D.R.A.T.) has started functioning at Mumbai and the petitioner would prosecute the appeal before the D.A.R.T.
The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission is granted. The petition is disposed
of as withdrawn.
The issues involved in the petition are kept
open.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
Bharat s/o Dattatraya Jog
State Bank of India
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
