The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner neither appeared nor assigned counsel to contest the matter on the fixed date.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
wp3305.1 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.3305 OF 2014
Gangadhar Balajirao Tappe
-vs-
The Hon'ble Lokayukta, Mah.State, Mantralaya and another
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
None for the petitioner.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 24.09.2014.
None appeared for the petitioner on 08/09/2014. None appears for the petitioner today also. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Gangadhar Balajirao Tappe
The Hon'ble Lokayukta, Mah.State, Mantralaya
another
Vasanti A. Naik
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
