Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition via alternate remedy. Court granted permission, disposed of the petition as withdrawn, and kept raised points open.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP273-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 273/2014
(DR.VANDANA NANDKISHORE KHEDIKAR & ANOTHER VERSUS R.S.T.M. NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, NAGPUR & ANOTHER)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri P.B. Patil, counsel for the R-1.
Smt.A.P. Shinde, counsel for the R-2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND P.R. BORA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2014.
Shri Bhandarkar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the petitioners would avail the alternate remedy and, hence, the petitioners desire to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is granted.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
The points raised in the petition are kept open.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Dr. Vandana Nandkishore Khedikar & Another
R.S.T.M. Nagpur University, Nagpur
Another
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
